data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88eb8/88eb8d37433268fc278324edc43ec7a7e04aa868" alt=""
He faces various levels of healthy skepticism from McGraw-Hill, which would publish the book, and Life magazine, which would preview serial excerpts. (Curiously, the now-defunct periodical was once a major player in the book industry, perhaps the Oprah of its time.) But Irving is resolved to stick with the lie and dig himself deeper into potential trouble. To immerse himself further into the myth of Hughes, Irving mimics the man's known mannerisms to a stalker-like extent. By the end he becomes a form of Hughes, paranoid and alone.
I like seeing Gere play a role that's a little manic; I don't think I've seen him like this since Mr. Jones. Incidentally, that film also starred Lena Olin, who would have been terrific here. (Her husband, Lasse Hallström, directed The Hoax.) Instead, we have Marcia Gay Harden playing Mrs. Irving with some form of indecipherable Euro accent; she's bizarrely miscast.
It's easy to forget that this film takes place in a post-Camelot era of trust. Richard Nixon is in the White House, and Irving's manuscript suggests that Howard Hughes' dealings with the President gave Nixon good reason to be paranoid about what the Democrats in the Watergate Hotel also knew. Okay, that part may or may not have happened, depending on whether you believe me.
1 comment:
I just listened to an interview of Richard Gere on NPR, and I am more interested in this movie.
The interview was kinda funny, though. Gere just didn't want to agree with anything that Terry Gross said about his career. She would mention that his career started off with musicals, and he would say it didn't, but then listed the musicals he acted in before he got a significant Hollywood career.
Um, Mr. Gere, isn't that what she just said?
Post a Comment